| MINUTES
OF SADP MEETING HELD ON APRIL 3 2004 AT CARRS LANE CHURCH
CENTRE
1. ELECTION OF CHAIR - Dave Church was elected.
There were 35 in attendance
2. WELCOME AND REPORTS - After the Chair¹s
opening remarks, there were three reports given. Eric Chester
from the USA SP gave a brief summary of SP activity in America.
They had 1200 members and were trying to build a broad based
Party. Nick Rogers reported from last weekend¹s SSP Conference.
It was generally a very positive conference, and he felt the
SSP was moving towards being a mass party. It already represented
a broad swathe of workers. The Conference was well attended
by young people, and there was a large RMT contingent. Conference
had agreed to support integrated education, not faith schools
as had been wrongly reported. Mike Davies from the AGS reported
that the organisation now had 300 members, and was particularly
strong in Yorkshire, London and the South East. Democracy,
Socialism and the Environment were the key issues. We all
needed to sort out how we take the green left forward after
the SA, he argued, and suggested 3 possibilities: the AGS
could expand; left groups could affiliate to the AGS; the
SADP could negotiate with the AGS and others to chart a common
way forward. He concluded by offering the electoral name AGS
should anyone want it.
3. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA - Dot Gibson
moved that we keep to the published agenda, with the exception
that the RDG resolutions entitled ŒThe Workers Party¹;
ŒThe crisis of democracy and a democratic alliance¹;
and Œ A Democratic and Republican Alliance¹ be remitted
to a separate, special meeting. This was agreed by 13 votes
to 6 with many abstentions
4. APOLOGIES - Rummy Hussain; Phil Pope;
Chris Jones; Lesley Mahmood; Danny Thompson; Steve Godward;
Bob Archer; Margaret McAdam; Terry Pierce
5. PROGRESS REPORTS ON DECISION MADE AT
THE LAST SADP MEETING
a) Membership - Pete Radcliff reported that
we had 59 members and 17 who had expressed an interest
b) Finance - John Pearson reported an income
of £536.86, of which £284 was in membership subs.
We had spent £489.10, the largest item being room hire
for meetings. We thus had a balance of £47.76. He announced
that Standing Order Forms were available. He suggested a Pooled
Fare Scheme for SADP meetings, based on the minimum fare available,
with the unwaged and those on strike pooling a figure of £5,
the waged meeting any deficit. This scheme was agreed. The
Meeting also agreed a vote of thanks to the person who had
made our excellent banner.
c) Composition of the SADP organising Committee
- it was generally felt that all affiliates should be represented
on the Committee, including those organisations not in the
SA, but it was agreed to retain the present structure for
the time being. Sue Blackwell announced her resignation from
the Committee - this was reluctantly accepted
d) Interim Statement - prepared and circulated
by Pete McLaren: this was noted
e) Resolutions left over from Manchester
DP and the AWL - they were moved as follows:
"The Democracy Platform supports branches
and individuals who wish to continue activity under the banner
of the SA and specifically to stand candidates in the June
local elections. The DP will therefore facilitate the setting
up of an autonomous network of SA branches that are prepared
to undertake this independent activity" (Manchester DP)
"This meeting calls for
1. Supporting and encouraging local Socialist
Alliances to continue to meet, to be active, and to contest
council elections, using the electoral name that we register.
2. Supporting and encouraging local groups
of SA activists who wish to continue to meet, to be active,
and to contest council elections on the basis of the broad
founding ideas of the SA, but are blocked by local majorities
who wish to wind down the SA.
3. Facilitate the coordination of these
active local groups through a federation of independent socialist
alliances.
4. Work with that federation to promote:
- A working-class socialist presence in
elections;
- Non-electoral political campaigning
on various issues, on a democratic, working class and socialist
basis.
- Cooperation with other socialist groups;
- Involvement in the trade union movement
and with the various initiatives now afoot for working-class
political representation and towards a new workers' party.
5. Work towards a new democratic alliance
of socialists.² (AWL)
Steve Freeman moved the following amendment
to the Manchester DP resolution:
³Delete ³...facilitate the setting
up of an autonomous network² and substitute ³support
and help to coordinate² in the last sentence.
In the general discussion, points were raised
about the need to coordinate supportive SAs and groups (Bruce
Robinson); the possibility of us coordinating a federation
of independent SAs and a new democratic alliance of socialists,
regenerating alliances from the past (Pete Radcliff); the
SA is dead and will not recover (Tony Greenstein); the need
to continue to fight both inside and outside the SA and maintain
the principles of the SA (Pete McLaren); the need to be aware
that the SWP could always reverse local SA decisions; the
SA is only dead in some areas, the SADP already exists and
we can use the name Democratic Socialist Alliance(Martin Ralph);
the SWP will not give up its control of SA national resources
- we can form an unofficial leadership and act in the name
of the SA - we represent the one third of SA members who have
consistently opposed the SWP - socialist unity is not dead
(John Pearson); it was the movement of the disenfranchised
working class that had given rise to the setting up of the
Socialist Alliance in the first place. Objectively the Socialist
Alliance is not dead because we are fighting for it, and it
is now vital that it is linked to moves by workers, particularly
the Liverpool dockers, to campaign for a new workers' party
(Bill Hunter); the Manchester DP resolution describes what
we are doing already, but we are not yet a federation of independent
SAs (Dot Gibson)
It was agreed by 12 votes to 2 to move to
a vote. Steve Freeman¹s amendment was passed by 18 votes
to 7, and the substantive resolution in the name of Manchester
DP was passed overwhelmingly. The AWL resolution was defeated
10 - 9
6.. SA CONFERENCE ON MARCH 13
A discussion took place about whether or
not to mount a legal challenge to the unconstitutionality
of the Task Group resolution. It was pointed out that litigation
is very expensive, it would be difficult to persuade the new
SA Nominating Officer to endorse SADP candidates even if we
did win an injunction, and it was questionable whether socialists
should use the capitalist courts against other socialists.
Sue Blackwell suggested that local SA branches might be prepared
to act as legal test cases which, if successful, could set
a legal precedent for others. She expressed the hope that
even if the SADP did not want to spend its national funds
on legal action it would not stand in the way of branches
which wanted to go down this route. Pete McLaren moved ŒThe
SADP agrees to back investigations into a legal challenge
being made by local SAs or SADP groups¹. This was passed
by 15 votes to 8
7. THE NEXT STAGE OF THE SOCIALIST ALLIANCE
John Pearson moved the following resolution
from Stockport:
1) The Socialist Alliance Democracy Platform
rejects any notion that the SA has "failed" or that
it is "dead". Any failure has been that of some
of the component organisations of the SA, in particular the
Socialist Workers Party, rather than of the unity project
itself. The original impulse for unity of socialists that
brought about the formation of the SA, remains valid, necessary
and urgent.
2) The SADP represents the healthy forces
within the SA, which deny the right of the liquidationist
leadership majority to kill off our hard won unity project.
As we stated in the 'Unity Appeal' that we distributed at
the Socialist Alliance Conference on 13 March 2004, we seek
to rally those who wish to defend, maintain and build the
SA.
3) The 'Task Group' resolution, passed by
the liquidationist majority at that Conference, is not only
unconstitutional and therefore unacceptable, it also signified
the unsuitability of the official leadership to continue to
act as such. The SADP will seek to rally all those SA branches
and individual members of the SA, who repudiate the official
leadership and who agree to organise independently of them,
in order to take forward the task of cementing the unity of
socialists. We will do this by pursuing the SADP's founding
aims of building a democratic and inclusive Socialist Alliance,
by fighting to win support for and to develop, the SA programme,
'People Before Profit' and by working to take forward the
project of socialist unity in the context of building a new
working class party.
4) The SADP recognises that one possible
reaction towards the outcome of the 13 March SA Conference,
may be a tendency to turn to localism. We must discourage
this, as it weakens our unity. In the context of the 10 June
local elections in particular, it is vital that we project
a national unity both in name and in programme. To this end,
in response to the expected refusal of the SA Nominating Officer
to authorise candidates to use the "Socialist Alliance"
title on ballot papers, we urge branches and groups of members
who stand candidates to use the title we have registered,
i.e. "Democratic Socialist Alliance".
5) The SADP reaffirms its decision to reach
out to other socialists and organisations of socialists, in
order to build unity. In view of the actions of the official
leadership at Conference, which fostered a split in the SA,
it is clear that we were correct to open up SADP membership
to comrades who are not currently SA members. We will now
seek to accelerate that area of recruitment.
6) Finally, we will organise to secure a
majority supporting the aims and objectives set out above,
at the SA Annual Conference later this year. Should the official
leadership of the SA refuse, or fail, to convene that Conference,
the SADP will do so.
Points made during the discussion included
the need for all SADP candidates to run under the same name
and policies (John Pearson); local members must be allowed
to make their own decision on what name they stand under to
keep everyone on board (Dave Church); we should agree to unite
as DSA to prevent fragmentation(Barry Biddolf). Tony Greenstein
moved the following amendments
a) The deletion of Point 1 apart from the
last sentence - agreed by 14 votes to 9
b) Change ³wish² to ³sought¹
in the last sentence of Point 2 - agreed by 10 votes to 8
c) Add ³or a similarly registered name²to
the end of Point 4 - agreed by 14 votes to 5
d) Delete all of Point 6 - defeated by 14
votes to 7.
The substantive resolution was agreed by
19 votes to 1, and reads as follows:
1) The original impulse for unity of socialists
that brought about the formation of the SA, remains valid,
necessary and urgent.
2) The SADP represents the healthy forces
within the SA, which deny the right of the liquidationist
leadership majority to kill off our hard won unity project.
As we stated in the 'Unity Appeal' that we distributed at
the Socialist Alliance Conference on 13 March 2004, we seek
to rally those who sought to defend, maintain and build the
SA.
3) The 'Task Group' resolution, passed by
the liquidationist majority at that Conference, is not only
unconstitutional and therefore unacceptable, it also signified
the unsuitability of the official leadership to continue to
act as such. The SADP will seek to rally all those SA branches
and individual members of the SA, who repudiate the official
leadership and who agree to organise independently of them,
in order to take forward the task of cementing the unity of
socialists. We will do this by pursuing the SADP's founding
aims of building a democratic and inclusive Socialist Alliance,
by fighting to win support for and to develop, the SA programme,
'People Before Profit' and by working to take forward the
project of socialist unity in the context of building a new
working class party.
4) The SADP recognises that one possible
reaction towards the outcome of the 13 March SA Conference,
may be a tendency to turn to localism. We must discourage
this, as it weakens our unity. In the context of the 10 June
local elections in particular, it is vital that we project
a national unity both in name and in programme. To this end,
in response to the expected refusal of the SA Nominating Officer
to authorise candidates to use the "Socialist Alliance"
title on ballot papers, we urge branches and groups of members
who stand candidates to use the title we have registered,
i.e. "Democratic Socialist Alliance" or a similarly
registered name.
5) The SADP reaffirms its decision to reach
out to other socialists and organisations of socialists, in
order to build unity. In view of the actions of the official
leadership at Conference, which fostered a split in the SA,
it is clear that we were correct to open up SADP membership
to comrades who are not currently SA members. We will now
seek to accelerate that area of recruitment.
6) Finally, we will organise to secure a
majority supporting the aims and objectives set out above,
at the SA Annual Conference later this year. Should the official
leadership of the SA refuse, or fail, to convene that Conference,
the SADP will do so.
8. PRIORITY ACTIVITIES OF THE SADP OVER
THE COMING MONTHS
a) Area reports - Martin Ralph reported
that in Merseyside it was hoped to stand 10 socialist candidates
under the general auspices of the SADP but they could stand
under different names according to local circumstances. They
will use the name SA or DSA whenever possible, and whatever
the SWP try to do about it. They would be standing alongside
the SP, Liverpool Community Party and the SLP - a socialist
challenge of about 27. He felt we must get the nomination
mechanics in place quickly, and that policy was needed on
the war, immigration, PFI and the corrupt use of private companies
by local Councils. Dave Spencer reported that it had been
hoped to also have around 27 socialist candidates.in Coventry,
although none were SA, and CAWSA had been coordinating city
wide meetings to facilitate this. The SP were standing in
all 18 wards as part of this initiative, and so were RESPECT
initially. RESPECT however had apparently now been ordered
not to stand the 3 or 4 candidates that were going to part
of this challenge, and even the local SWP were unhappy about
this. Beth Aze from Manchester reported that the SWP had packed
their recent SA meeting in Chorlton to decide that there would
be no SA candidates, the SA would not meet again until after
June 10, and 90% of the SA funds would be sent to RESPECT.
SADP supporters had responded by producing a newsletter and
moving out into South Manchester where there may be some socialist
candidates. Sue Blackwell added that there would be socialist
candidates in Birmingham. Dot Gibson suggested these reports
be put on our web site - the problems socialists were now
having shows what that SA Conference decision meant on the
ground. Who will be opposing racism? We need to mobilise to
support those who are standing, and travel to give practical
support. Dave Church re-iterated the need to sort out the
nominating process quickly and accurately
b) Registration of electoral name - John
Pearson reported that the application for ŒDemocratic
Socialist Alliance¹ was made 5 weeks ago, with Barry
Biddolf as Nominating Officer and Pete McLaren as ŒParty
Leader¹ Our registration cheque had been cashed 3 weeks
ago, but we still awaited a decision. Dave Church suggested
we use the logo as on our web site, with DSA rather than SADP
- this was agreed. It was also agreed that we issue a Press
Statement about our socialist election candidates nearer the
time
c) SADP Election material - Pete Radcliff
suggested we all circulate local leaflets, and that the web
address be used on leaflets. John Pearson reminded the meeting
that Dave Parkes was working on an anti BNP leaflet to supplement
local materials. Mike Davies stressed the importance of suggesting
people vote socialist, not just ³Don¹t Vote BNP²
c) Building links with left groups not in
the SA/SADP - Pete McLaren suggested the Committee prioritise
this. He welcomed ideas to progress it,. Pete Radcliff suggested
we call local meetings of groups. Eric Chester suggested the
SADP plan for a large Conference in 6 to 12 months and invite
all left groups to participate. Jim Denham felt we should
meet with the Labour Representation Committee The SADP Committee
was asked to persue these ideas
d) RDG Resolution on Building the SADP
This meeting resolves to continue to build
the SADP and continue the struggle against the current SA
Executive, which is destroying the SA.
i) Support any local SA which seeking
to stand candidates in the June elections
ii) In the event that any SA candidates
are prevented from standing, we will begin a campaign of
no confidence in the current leadership. We will carry this
campaign into the working class movement.
iii) Plan a better intervention for the
next SA conference
iv) Set up local SADP groups or rebuild
local Socialist Alliances
v) Establish regular SADP Committee meetings.
vi) Encourage all SA's to affiliate to
the SADP
vii) All affiliates to be invited to send
one delegate to the Committee
viii) Set up a working group to develop
a plan for an SADP paper
ix) Continue the unity appeal and campaign
to win all SA Indies to the SADP
x) Produce an Open letter to the CPGB
criticising their recent role and demanding they unite with
the opposition against the liquidators.
xi) Organise working groups to campaign
for a workers party and a democratic and republican alliance.
It was agreed to remit this resolution to
the Committee
e) Linking with other initiatives - Dave
Church stressed the need to forge links with the Liverpool
dockers and other initiatives more formally for the future.
Pete Radcliff moved, and it was unanimously agreed, that we
welcome the Liverpool initiative and send a message of support.
It was also agreed to sponsor a London meeting being organised
by Dot Gibson
9. CONFIRMATION OF NEXT SADP MEETINGS
These were confirmed as advertised - May
15 and June 19 at USC, Gough St, Birmingham. The June 19 meeting
would include the 3 RDG resolutions deferred from today, and
would include an invite to other left political groups including
AGS, SP, WP and the Liverpool dockers initiative. |